[press release from Midwest Environmental Advocates

via WisPolitics]

Once again, factory farms get a pass from a major environmental law 2/27/2008

If you live downwind from a mega-farm, don't put away those gas masks just yet.

The Natural Resources Board voted today to approve a Department of Natural Resources (DNR) rule that grants "sources of hazardous air pollution associated with agricultural waste" (read: manure) yet another exemption from state requirements concerning toxic air emissions. Now, these sources of pollution won't have to meet state requirements until July 31, 2011.

In 2004, when the DNR made changes to its regulations concerning hazardous air pollution, agricultural sources were given an initial three-year exemption, ostensibly to conduct research and gather information so that regulation could proceed responsibly. That exemption expired in June of 2007. During that three-year period, the DNR commenced one small study that is still not complete, and the corporate agricultural industry sat on its hands and did nothing other than hire lobbyists who could bring home yet another lengthy exemption from environmental standards.

"Today's decision is a huge disappointment for those concerned about breathing clean, healthy air in Wisconsin," said Jamie Saul, Staff Attorney with Midwest Environmental Advocates. "The simple technology that exists now for controlling toxic emissions from mega-farms is being used in other states, and the DNR's additional four-year delay is a blow to rural communities."

Manure, when concentrated and stored in massive quantities, has the potential to release dangerous amounts of ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, and particulate matter. While these toxic gasses are most dangerous to those working in close proximity to the stored manure, studies show that they can also pose a health threat to those who live downwind of the facility.

No other industry has earned an exemption from these much-needed state requirements. And though it is true that agricultural waste is challenging to regulate because of its diffuse nature (contrasted with a typical factory smokestack), state regulations allow for a flexible system of Best Management Practices to reduce these emissions from agricultural sources. And what's more, the emission levels triggering state regulation are so high that only the very largest livestock operations would be covered by the rule.

Still, this flexibility and initial delay weren't enough for the DNR and corporate agriculture, who complained that regulation would be too burdensome and scientifically unfounded. But while state and federal studies continue, and may yield valuable information, other states such as Iowa, Colorado, and North Carolina have already taken steps to reduce toxic emissions from agricultural sources, leaving Wisconsin in the (manure-laden) dust.

Tags
Submitted by borges on